Welcome to BAVM

BAVM is an association of lawyers practicing in the Supreme Court, High Courts, Tribunals, CESTAT, PMLA, Settlement Commission, National Company Law Tribunal, National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, National Green Tribunal and other Forums. The foundation of BAVM has been laid under the guidance of Late Mr. R. K. Garg (Former Judge) & Late Mr. P. N. Awasthi (Advocate) who mentored us and gave a vision.

More About Us

We, assist our clients in the areas of Advisory, Litigation and Research, Legal Opinions (Consultation), in the domains of GST,  Customs, Central Excise, Service Tax, FEMA, Money Laundering, Environment and other matters with our utmost effort to deliver the best before the respective Forums.

Practice Areas

News Flash

Key People

Previous
Next

Our Clients

News Section

Great Relief for Taxpayers – Reduction in Pre-deposit for Penalty-only Appeals under GST

In a major relief for taxpayers, the Government has reduced the pre-deposit requirement for filing appeals in penalty-only cases under GST. Pursuant to the GST Council’s 55th Meeting recommendations, the Finance Act, 2025 amended Sections 107(6) and 112(8) of the CGST Act to lower the pre-deposit from 25% to 10% for appeals before the Appellate Authority, and to prescribe an additional 10% for appeals before the Appellate Tribunal. The amendment, effective 1 October 2025, ensures fair access to justice and eases the compliance burden on small taxpayers and individuals.

Department for Revenue amended the Notification by inserting conditions and eligibility for taking input tax credit under Section 16 and Section 148 of the CGST Act

Articles and Publications

CESTAT safeguard contractors: 12% interest on unlawful tax collection.

The CESTAT Bench, New Delhi, allowed a series of appeals [M/s Girraj Construction Company & Others vs. CCE, Final Order No. 51743-51764/2025 dated 11.11.2025] filed by various contractors engaged in constructing EWS/LIG houses for Rajasthan Housing Board (RHB). The Tribunal held that the service tax paid by the contractors and the amount deposited by RHB under the Reverse Charge Mechanism was never leviable and paid under mistake of law, which was fully exempt under Notification No. 25/2012-ST. Lower authorities rejected the refund claims of RHB for the reason that the appellants could not file certificate of RHB, whereas show cause notices itself admitted that RHB had deducted from the contractors and deposited 50% of the tax, hence the Tribunal clarified that no additional certificate from RHB can be demanded. Relied upon the earlier judgment in the case of M/s Meenu Builders [2025 (31) CENTAX 356 (Tri.Del)]. The Tribunal further held that Sections 11B and 11BB of the Central Excise Act do not apply to such mistaken payments, making the contractors entitled to complete refund along with 12% interest. All appellants were effectively represented by Advocates Shri Bipin Garg along with Ms. J. Kainaat, whose submissions were accepted by the Tribunal.

CESTAT F.O. of M/s Agarwal Builders

Connect With Us

The Rules of the Bar Council of India prohibit the lawyers to advertise themselves. This website is meant only for informational purposes and not for advertising. It should not be interpreted as advertisement of any nature whatsoever. We are not at all responsible for decisions taken by the reader based solely on the information provided in the website. In case, the reader of this website has any legal issues, he/she must seek independent legal advice. By continuing to browse the website the visitor accepts and acknowledges that the information provided in the website does not amount to advertisement or solicitation and is meant only for his/her understanding about our activities and who we are.